Friday, September 28, 2012

Erasing Melky Cabrera's Batting Title Just Another Baseball Cover-Up

Sleight of hand can’t fix this one.  Neither will an eraser.  Major League Baseball may have changed the rules, but fans will always remember the year the San Francisco Giants’ Melky Cabrera lead the National League in hitting while testing positive for a banned substance.
It’s too bad really, and it’s all on Cabrera.  Andrew McCutchen and Buster Posey are both more deserving of the batting title, and it would have been a great story for either to win it legitimately.  But neither performed as well as Cabrera on the field, and that’s what a batting title measures.
Baseball is a numbers driven sport long-wedded to statistics.  And while we sometimes don’t like those numbers, they never lie. 
It’s a bed-rock principle of the sport.  The integrity of the numbers as something we all watched play out on the field is one of the reasons we love the game.   
Barry Bonds and Mark McGuire hold or held prestigious homerun records, and each tested positive for performance enhancing drugs.  But for all the clamor and controversy surrounding the players, their names are still in the books. 
Their records and accolades still stand.
Baseball, Melky Cabrera and the Major League Baseball Players Union have blinders on if they think this will all go away just because Cabrera refuses to accept the trophy.  In fact, this ploy to cover-up the truth about the statistics only cements the incident in history. 
Indeed, the controversy created by Cabrera and the rule-book wizards is certain to keep this year’s batting title in people’s memories.  You might not remember who won the batting title five years ago, but five years from now you will remember when the sport tried to cover up Cabrera’s undeserved title.
I give credit to the rule-book aficionados who came up with the idea to just have Cabrera ask that certain rules not apply to him this year.  That was creative. 
It reminds me of that movie “Blades of Glory” where Will Farrell and Jon Heder play two male figure skaters banned from singles who seize upon a rule-book technicality hatched by a psycho super-fan to enter the pairs skating event at the fictional World Winter Sport Games.  Two men in pairs figure skating was an outrageously funny hook in a comedy that set out to expose the underbelly of figuring skating.
But that was comedic fiction. 
Sadly, the Cabrera rule-book technicality is real life baseball.
In truth, Cabrera put baseball in a tough position when he asked for a rule change that seemed so fair and pleasing.   It must have seemed like an irresistible drug to the sport, and I almost don’t blame the league for playing to the masses that were clamoring for a short-term fix to a messy situation. 
But at the end of the day, it was a mistake to grant a player’s request to disregard a rule—a classic example of the saying “bad facts make bad law.”
Honestly, what if other players want to ignore or change rules in the future?  Will baseball grant their requests?  And if so, when and based on what standard?
Will the it-feels-good standard apply?
Besides, forcing Cabrera to own an undeserved batting title this year would have been a sweet reminder of his crimes for the rest of time—a scarlet letter that would have lived with the player and the league as a reminder of the PED era.
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t like Cabrera winning the batting title.  But this contrived opt-out solution hatched by Cabrera and embraced by baseball is somewhat embarrassing and doesn’t come close to penalizing the player or showing the public that baseball is finally going to take cheating seriously.
If anything, it let’s Cabrera off the hook and clears his conscience.
If baseball, Cabrera and the Players Union were serious about doing the right thing they would have signed an agreement whereby Cabrera turns in his All-Star MVP trophy and agrees to donate 100% of his guaranteed playoff share to a charity that fights drug abuse.  The trophy is a meaningless piece of glass at this point, and it was given to Cabrera by voters who didn’t know the truth.  And as for the playoff share—well, there is simply no good reason for Cabrera to participate in post-season revenue sharing this season.
And while we’re considering one-year rules changes for the better of the game, why not change the dumbest rule ever created—the rule that gives the winner of the All-Star game home field advantage in the World Series.  Yes, force the Giants or some other National League squad to play four of seven on the road as a penalty for Cabrera’s suspension.   Of all the possible rules baseball could have changed this year, changing the All-Star rule would have been the most just.
It’s only an exhibition anyway.
Cabrera was the darling of this year’s Mid-Summer Classic, and forfeiting the National League in that game or flat changing the All-Star rule would have sent fans the kind of message baseball, Cabrera and the Player’s Union thought they were sending when they attempted this opt-out-of-the-batting-title nonsense.
Think that’s too harsh?  Okay. 
But if Cabrera is clean enough to affect the outcome of the 2012 World Series, he’s clean enough to own an undeserving batting title.

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Seriously, the NFL Referee Lockout Never Threatened the League's Integrity

You want to reminisce about those bad calls, go ahead.  You want to say that the replacement refs hurt the flow of the game, fine.  But please, spare me talk about how the replacement refs undermined the integrity of the NFL.
That’s ridiculous.
Never have I heard so many people take the sport of football so seriously.  As if football was some kind of noble profession that needed to be protected, like teachers or firefighters.  As if that little trademark—now apparently called “The Shield”—was a banner for kings.
What is this, the Game of Thrones?
I know when the NFL talks to its players it tries to stress integrity and all that.  And no doubt we’ll hear more of it now that the lockout is over.  But folks, just because the NFL aspires to basic compliance with state laws and fairness doesn’t mean the league has actually achieved integrity.
The NFL is about entertainment and money.  Period.  That’s what it does well.
It’s not about integrity.  Integrity is a phony sales pitch the league came up with to convince people it was about more than just entertainment and money.
Shame on so many for embracing it. 
A jury convicted Ray Lewis of obstruction of justice and sent him to prison for his unseemly role in a fight that left two people dead.
Person of integrity?  No.  Entertaining athlete?  Yes. 
Poster-child for the NFL?  No question about it.
Other players have been involved in death to human beings (Donte Stallworth, Rae Carruth, Leonard Little), gun play (Adam Jones, Plaxico Burress), drug dealing (Jamal Lewis), sexual harassment (Ben Roethlisberger, twice), and dog fighting (Michael Vick). 
People of integrity?  Please.  Entertaining athletes?  Absolutely.
Pushed by the NFL as stars to adore?  In most cases, yes. 
In any normal workplace these folks would be fired and struggle to find employment.  But in the NFL, the pure lack of integrity that accompanies an enterprise focused solely on entertainment and money allowed many of them soft landings.   
People watched an apparently rehabilitated Michael Vick when he joined the Eagles post-prison in part because of his sordid past.  And you know what?  Fans, the NFL, the Eagles and Vick all came out winners.  
But is that integrity?
The lack of integrity doesn’t end with the players either.  Coaches cheat (Bill Belichick), shake hands too hard (Jim Schwartz and Jim Harbaugh), and punch each other (Tom Cable).  Even NFL writers spit on integrity as evidenced by their asinine decision to vote Brian Cushing the NFL Defensive Rookie of the Year after he was caught cheating in his rookie year!
All that, and I’m honestly supposed to believe that the NFL replacement referees hurt the game’s integrity?
Honestly, did anyone not trying to protect the locked-out referees actually believe that?
Were you drinking?
Sure, penalties were harder to predict.  And yes, the refs cost the Packers the game.  But get over it—this was hardly an earthquake to honor and honesty.  Try not to forget that just about every person on the field in every game wanted to embarrass the replacement refs on every play.
No real ref ever had to go through that.
Players, ex-players, and ex-referees are pushing this integrity nonsense, and they’re using words like “scabs” to drive home their bloated opinions.  My advice—stop drinking their biased Kool-aid.  Smart guys and gals are not surprised to see those folks fighting the NFL owners and finding solidarity with the poor locked-out referees. 
After years of ignoring bad calls, television commentators are now laying into the replacement refs with obviously pent-up anger and citing journalistic integrity to justify the attacks.  I say, where has that hard-hitting journalism been the last thirty years? 
Journalistic integrity from the booth, ha!
Because the NFL is about entertainment and money, this replacement referee situation was probably the best thing to happen to the NFL’s bottom line in years.  Never has there been more interest.  Never more eyes glued to this league.
So while the lockout may be over, please muzzle your friends and coworkers when they start in with the integrity business.  
This was never about integrity. 
This was about entertainment and money.  And the NFL isn’t about anything more.
Bob Firpo is an attorney and freelance sports and outdoors writer.  He lives in Boise, Idaho.  Follow him @knockingitout